Anthology of Computers and the Humanities · Volume 3

Was Poetry Graded Validly?: Text Mining Shipin, a Sixth-Century Chinese Work of Literary Criticism

Wenyi Shang1 ORCID and Emily Xueyue Liu1 ORCID

  • 1 School of Information Science & Learning Technologies, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA

Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.63744/uNUzr0wn2VsQ

Published: 21 November 2025

Keywords: literary criticism, classical Chinese poetry, text mining, BERT embeddings, classification

Abstract

This paper applies text mining to investigate Shipin (Poetry Gradings), a sixth-century Chinese work of literary criticism. Using a BERT model fine-tuned with masked language modeling on a classical Chinese poetry corpus, we generated embeddings for Shipin’s evaluative remarks on each poet and their own poetry corpora, and explored the relationship between these embeddings and the grades assigned to each poet by Shipin using PCA and machine learning classification. We found that both remarks and poetry provide some justification for the assigned grades, with remarks showing a much closer alignment. A poet’s dynastic period and poetic origin influenced the grades they received in nuanced ways, reflecting Shipin’s preference for poetic styles. The results indicate that Shipin maintained an implicit but consistent standard in grading.