This paper presents a computational method for studying how the meaning of cultural artefacts varies across online communities. Rather than treating topic model outputs as thematic labels, we propose using full topic-proportion vectors as discursive signatures that capture meaning at both the level of individual expression and the community contexts that shape it. By aggregating these signatures at the community level, validating groupings with PERMANOVA, applying hierarchical clustering, and projecting the resulting space via PCA, we produce a topology of discourse: a spatial representation of how meaning-making varies systematically across contexts. We demonstrate the method through a case study of mental health technology discourse on Reddit (289,039 posts across 445 subreddits), showing how the same technologies are conceptualised differently depending on community context. The method is designed to be transferable to any domain where researchers seek to understand how technologies, practices, or concepts are variably constituted across online spaces.
